Beware of cheap underperforming clones

As of 2022 there are many badly performing clones on the market. V2/3GHz NanoVNA uses parts like ADF4350 and AD8342 which are costly and clones have been cutting costs by using salvaged or reject parts.

See official store and look for V2 Plus4/V2 Plus4 Pro versions only to avoid getting a bad clone. We have stopped selling V2.2 versions since October 2020, so all V2 hardware that are not Plus or Plus4 are not made by us and we can not guarantee performance.

NanoVNA V2 Forum

Note: this page is a mirror of https://groups.io/g/NanoVNAV2.
Click here to join and see most recent posts.

automating NanoVNA saverRe: [nanovnav2] Python or Matlab file for nanoVNA SAA2


Jim Lux 2021/07/06 07:26

On 7/6/21 6:26 AM, Albert Kleyn wrote:
> I have the NanoVNA SAA2 ( with the N type connectors)
> Mine works fine with the NanoVNA-Saver S/W
> As I mainly use it for Antenna measurements this does me fine.
> Albert
> EI7II.
>
Good news for Khalid..

I use NanoVNA-Saver a lot, but lately, i've been using a more stripped
down program nanovna.py (that is for the original ones only, I think),
because it has a useful command line interface.

I've been looking at NanoVNA-Saver to see if I could split it into a
front end/backend architecture - front end for the (optional) GUI, back
end for the "run the VNA" - but it looks to be a fair amount of work. I
like the multiplatform aspect of NanoVNA-Saver and a somewhat richer
feature set (i.e. calibrations).



Kevin O'Brien 2021/07/06 12:25

Hi Jim,

I also like the multi-platform aspects of NanoVNA-Saver, but wanted a
command line interface.

I wrote a simple Python script, attached, which provides a command line or
Jupyter notebook interface to the NanoVNA-Saver internals for calibration,
frequency domain measurements, and TDR measurements.

It worked well for a class I taught last semester using the V2 and V2Plus4.

Regards,
Kevin


On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:26 AM Jim Lux <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote:

Jim Lux 2021/07/06 09:47

On 7/6/21 9:25 AM, Kevin O'Brien wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I also like the multi-platform aspects of NanoVNA-Saver, but wanted a
> command line interface.
>
> I wrote a simple Python script, attached, which provides a command
> line or Jupyter notebook interface to the NanoVNA-Saver internals for
> calibration, frequency domain measurements, and TDR measurements.
>
> It worked well for a class I taught last semester using the V2 and
> V2Plus4.
>
> Regards,
> Kevin


This is quite nice.. thanks.. you should do a pull request and see if
you can add it to nanovna-saver...

To reply to this topic, join https://groups.io/g/NanoVNAV2

View this thread on groups.io