Beware of cheap underperforming clones

As of 2023 there are many badly performing clones on the market. V2/3GHz NanoVNA uses parts like ADF4350 and AD8342 which are costly and clones have been cutting costs by using salvaged or reject parts.

See official store and look for V2 Plus4/V2 Plus4 Pro versions only to avoid getting a bad clone. We have stopped selling V2.2 versions since October 2020, so all V2 hardware that are not Plus or Plus4 are not made by us and we can not guarantee performance.

NanoVNA V2 Forum

Note: this page is a mirror of https://groups.io/g/NanoVNAV2.
Click here to join and see most recent posts.

Phase Matching 2 dipole antennas


Tom W8JI 2025/06/15 00:24

Hi Bob,

Jim Lux said it one way. I will say what he said a different way.

The two dipoles have mutual coupling across space. Since the two
antennas are not exactly in phase or exactly out of phase, but are
actually vastly different in phase, they will have quite different feed
point impedances. This difference in phase of fields from antenna 1
reaching antenna 2 and from the fields of antenna 2 reaching antenna 1
will shift both the reactance and the resistance quite differently at
each antenna feed point. The grossly dissimilar feed point impedance
shifts will cause the feed lines and phasing lines to not behave like we
might think.

In operation the real phase shift and current levels will not be
anywhere near equal and not have the 90 degrees lag you cut the delay
cable for.

The only way to measure the real phase shift and current levels (we
usually want a two element to have equal currents in each element, not
equal voltage or equal power) you would need to excite the antenna and
measure the vector currents in each element. The Nano VNA will not help
you do this.

Modeling the antenna array with the phasing and feed lines in the model
is by far the easiest thing to do. The NanoVNA can help characterize the
transmission lines and the antennas for use in a model or verify the
model, but the VNA cannot tell you how the antenna system is behaving.

I hope this helps..
73 Tom


On 6/12/2025 4:07 PM, Bob via groups.io wrote:

> I would like the NaNoVNA to help me steer my dual dipole array.  I
> have 2 15m dipoles running E/W, so there is a S. Antenna and a N.
> Antenna.  Currently I have the same length of quad shielded feed cable
> running from each antenna to a splitter box.  The S. Antenna has a 1/4
> wave phasing cable along with the basic cable length with a goal of
> steering the detection to 65/70 degrees above the S. Horizon.  My
> questions are:
> 1/ Can I use the NanoVNA to determine the phase angle between the two
> feeder cables?  Ideally I would like to hook North up to S11 and the
> other (South) to S21 to confirm no phase difference.  This would
> confirm that both feeder cables were the same length and the beam was
> 90 degrees straight up.
> 2/ I'd then like to check my phase cables to the S. Antenna to confirm
> they are 90 and 135 degrees compared to the N.
> I have some basic understanding of engineering/physics but what I
> could really use is a procedure and some guidance to interpret the
> results.  Any assistance (including saying you can't do that with a
> NaNoVNA) would be appreciated.
> For background, the application is a Radio Jove antenna to detect
> Solar and Jupiter Radio Bursts at 20.1 MHz.  I have linked a photo of
> the set up.
> Thanks in advance,
> Bob
>

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

gary miller 2025/06/15 07:07

Actually one can use the nanovnav2 to characterize the pair of dipole
antennas. The mutual coupling can be measured by treating the antennas as a
two port network. Calibrate the analyzer with sufficient length cables and
then connect the cables to the antenna feed positions and measure the 2-port
scattering parameters (S11, S12, S21, S22). Characterize the feed network in
the same manner and then connect the two networks together via software and
one has a network model for the entire system based upon measured data. By
assuming that the radiation patterns of the two dipoles are the same as a
dipole in free space (a pretty good approximation) one can then calculate the
radiation pattern of the array as well as the driving point impedance of the
network.



> On Jun 14, 2025, at 22:26, Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> wrote:
>
>

> 

>

> Hi Bob,
>
> Jim Lux said it one way. I will say what he said a different way.
>
> The two dipoles have mutual coupling across space. Since the two antennas
are not exactly in phase or exactly out of phase, but are actually vastly
different in phase, they will have quite different feed point impedances. This
difference in phase of fields from antenna 1 reaching antenna 2 and from the
fields of antenna 2 reaching antenna 1 will shift both the reactance and the
resistance quite differently at each antenna feed point. The grossly
dissimilar feed point impedance shifts will cause the feed lines and phasing
lines to not behave like we might think.
>
> In operation the real phase shift and current levels will not be anywhere
near equal and not have the 90 degrees lag you cut the delay cable for.
>
> The only way to measure the real phase shift and current levels (we usually
want a two element to have equal currents in each element, not equal voltage
or equal power) you would need to excite the antenna and measure the vector
currents in each element. The Nano VNA will not help you do this.
>
> Modeling the antenna array with the phasing and feed lines in the model is
by far the easiest thing to do. The NanoVNA can help characterize the
transmission lines and the antennas for use in a model or verify the model,
but the VNA cannot tell you how the antenna system is behaving.
>
> I hope this helps..
> 73 Tom
>
>
> On 6/12/2025 4:07 PM, Bob via groups.io wrote:

>

>> I would like the NaNoVNA to help me steer my dual dipole array. I have 2
15m dipoles running E/W, so there is a S. Antenna and a N. Antenna. Currently
I have the same length of quad shielded feed cable running from each antenna
to a splitter box. The S. Antenna has a 1/4 wave phasing cable along with the
basic cable length with a goal of steering the detection to 65/70 degrees
above the S. Horizon. My questions are:

>>

>>
>>

>> 1/ Can I use the NanoVNA to determine the phase angle between the two
feeder cables? Ideally I would like to hook North up to S11 and the other
(South) to S21 to confirm no phase difference. This would confirm that both
feeder cables were the same length and the beam was 90 degrees straight up.

>>

>>
>>

>> 2/ I'd then like to check my phase cables to the S. Antenna to confirm they
are 90 and 135 degrees compared to the N.

>>

>>
>>

>> I have some basic understanding of engineering/physics but what I could
really use is a procedure and some guidance to interpret the results. Any
assistance (including saying you can't do that with a NaNoVNA) would be
appreciated.

>>

>>
>>

>> For background, the application is a Radio Jove antenna to detect Solar and
Jupiter Radio Bursts at 20.1 MHz. I have linked a photo of the set up.

>>

>>
>>

>>
>>

>> <Screenshot 2025-06-08 at 5.24.01?PM.png>

>>

>>
>>

>> Thanks in advance,

>>

>> Bob

>

>
> [![](https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-
avg-v1.png)](http://www.avg.com/email-
signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-
email&utm_content=emailclient)| Virus-
free.[www.avg.com](http://www.avg.com/email-
signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-
email&utm_content=emailclient)
> ---|---

_._,_._,_

* * *

Jim Lux 2025/06/15 19:27

You could use a NanoVNA to measure this, but it&rsquo;s tricky.
Port 0 would be connected the antenna feed.
Port 1 would be connected to some sort of current probe, which you could put on each antenna. You&rsquo;d need to calibrate the gain and phase from the probe back to the VNA.
Then you&rsquo;d measure S21 for each of the antennas, and from that you could determine the actual current in each antenna (and hence its radiated field).

This is like measuring currents in the 4 verticals of a 4 square.

This seems a bit complex - you&rsquo;d need a third coax run, you need the current probe. The probe would probably need a buffer amplifier. It would be quite a project (someone looking for a Master&rsquo;s thesis project).

Realistically - this is something that will model fairly well in NEC. For radio astronomy (it&rsquo;s a Radio Jove antenna, right? that&rsquo;s good enough.

Here&rsquo;s an inexpensive idea- get yourself a two input SDR, run equal length coax to each antenna, and do the phasing in software. SDRplay makes a 2 input SDR - although I&rsquo;m not sure the captures are synchronized (the sample clock is, but the start of the capture isn&rsquo;t, and I&rsquo;m not sure about the independent LOs). Or you could use a pair of RTL-SDRv3 running in direct sample mode (no LO).

Jim Lux 2025/06/16 07:35

Those dipoles are over something at way less than a wavelength, so not free
space, but yes, a cookbook pattern would probably work.



If you’re python facile, scikit-rf has all the code you need to do the
analysis, including the calibration of the VNA and solving for the element
currents.







> On Jun 16, 2025, at 02:23, gary miller via groups.io
<gary_e_miller=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
>
>

> 

>

> Actually one can use the nanovnav2 to characterize the pair of dipole
antennas. The mutual coupling can be measured by treating the antennas as a
two port network. Calibrate the analyzer with sufficient length cables and
then connect the cables to the antenna feed positions and measure the 2-port
scattering parameters (S11, S12, S21, S22). Characterize the feed network in
the same manner and then connect the two networks together via software and
one has a network model for the entire system based upon measured data. By
assuming that the radiation patterns of the two dipoles are the same as a
dipole in free space (a pretty good approximation) one can then calculate the
radiation pattern of the array as well as the driving point impedance of the
network.

>

>
>

>

>> On Jun 14, 2025, at 22:26, Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> wrote:
>
>

>

>> 

>>

>> Hi Bob,
>
> Jim Lux said it one way. I will say what he said a different way.
>
> The two dipoles have mutual coupling across space. Since the two antennas
are not exactly in phase or exactly out of phase, but are actually vastly
different in phase, they will have quite different feed point impedances. This
difference in phase of fields from antenna 1 reaching antenna 2 and from the
fields of antenna 2 reaching antenna 1 will shift both the reactance and the
resistance quite differently at each antenna feed point. The grossly
dissimilar feed point impedance shifts will cause the feed lines and phasing
lines to not behave like we might think.
>
> In operation the real phase shift and current levels will not be anywhere
near equal and not have the 90 degrees lag you cut the delay cable for.
>
> The only way to measure the real phase shift and current levels (we usually
want a two element to have equal currents in each element, not equal voltage
or equal power) you would need to excite the antenna and measure the vector
currents in each element. The Nano VNA will not help you do this.
>
> Modeling the antenna array with the phasing and feed lines in the model is
by far the easiest thing to do. The NanoVNA can help characterize the
transmission lines and the antennas for use in a model or verify the model,
but the VNA cannot tell you how the antenna system is behaving.
>
> I hope this helps..
> 73 Tom
>
>
> On 6/12/2025 4:07 PM, Bob via groups.io wrote:

>>

>>> I would like the NaNoVNA to help me steer my dual dipole array. I have 2
15m dipoles running E/W, so there is a S. Antenna and a N. Antenna. Currently
I have the same length of quad shielded feed cable running from each antenna
to a splitter box. The S. Antenna has a 1/4 wave phasing cable along with the
basic cable length with a goal of steering the detection to 65/70 degrees
above the S. Horizon. My questions are:

>>>

>>>
>>>

>>> 1/ Can I use the NanoVNA to determine the phase angle between the two
feeder cables? Ideally I would like to hook North up to S11 and the other
(South) to S21 to confirm no phase difference. This would confirm that both
feeder cables were the same length and the beam was 90 degrees straight up.

>>>

>>>
>>>

>>> 2/ I'd then like to check my phase cables to the S. Antenna to confirm
they are 90 and 135 degrees compared to the N.

>>>

>>>
>>>

>>> I have some basic understanding of engineering/physics but what I could
really use is a procedure and some guidance to interpret the results. Any
assistance (including saying you can't do that with a NaNoVNA) would be
appreciated.

>>>

>>>
>>>

>>> For background, the application is a Radio Jove antenna to detect Solar
and Jupiter Radio Bursts at 20.1 MHz. I have linked a photo of the set up.

>>>

>>>
>>>

>>>
>>>

>>> <Screenshot 2025-06-08 at 5.24.01?PM.png>

>>>

>>>
>>>

>>> Thanks in advance,

>>>

>>> Bob

>>

>>
> [![](https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-
avg-v1.png)](http://www.avg.com/email-
signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-
email&utm_content=emailclient)| Virus-
free.[www.avg.com](http://www.avg.com/email-
signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-
email&utm_content=emailclient)
>> ---|---

_._,_._,_

* * *

To reply to this topic, join https://groups.io/g/NanoVNAV2

View this thread on groups.io