Robert Mueller 2021/05/01 21:07
I had a similar "discovery". In Win 10 I was advised to load a Cypess
driver for the ThinkPad Laptop but when looking in the device manager it
appears to me (not the greatest for dealing with the deeper levels of
hardware) there it is marked that there is something to do with Intel at
the USB drivers. While I believe the USB ought to be Universal at that
external plug to the VNA, I fear there are not such universal rules at the
interface of the computer internal hardware and just cramming a Cypress
driver into the Laptop will just cause a need to repair who knows what will
suffer. Meanwhile, on a Win 7 running laptopthe VNA works with nanoVNA _qt
on both the Plus 4 and another VNA will poorer specs which also refused to
talk to Win 10 / Intel. There was no fooling around and wasting time.
Everything went on the first try.
The following is speculation so feel free to correct me and my guesses but
I suspect that Microsoft / Intel decide absolutely Universal is not
required; they may have ignored some service which was common in the
distant past but that the VNA depends on that service. In the past, I had
a problem with a Canon flatbed scanner which a newer computer refused to
accept although the Canon still worked on an older computer. To me this is
a betrayal to the idea of the bus being universal. At the consumer end it
may have to retain more or less out of date procedures because a fair
number of buyers of more modern computers may have no need to throw money
at new hardware, or worse, in some cases the old stuff does something
useful but nobody sells new equipment quite able to do the job, and that is
even more true with software which does not run on new operating systems.
Here the "modernization" is making trouble for a brand new device.
Anyway, my plan is to dedicate an older computer to measuring (and running
perfectly satisfactory older software) until I learn that teaching the
Intel part to do Cypress procedures really is safe.
If there is a better explanation I would be happy to learn it..
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 8:02 PM ok1vaw <ok1vaw@volny.cz> wrote:
> I have to confirm incompatibility of NanoVNA Saver 0.3.8 with V2 Plus 4.
> As above mentioned, with my old V2 both programs (QT and Saver 0.3.8) are
> working, with new V2 Plus 4 (received just few days ago) only the QT
> works. I see that the new COM port is assigned (in my case COM8), the QT
> works too, but the NanoVNA Saver *DOES NOT WORK with V2 Plus4*.
> In the NanoVNA Saver 0.3.8 the serial port window remains blank, pushing
> Rescan button does nothing, above-mentioned idea from OWO to write
> directly COM port to the window does not help too.
> So I am convinced, that the *compatibility problem is in NanoVNA saver
> 0.3.8.*
>
>
>