Hello,
do you know the status of the development of NanoVNA-QT? I've seen that this very nice tool is not recompiled since may, even if some commits are available. Moreover, no new feature have been implemented (like enhanced response or other possible improvements). It would be a pity since this tool is quite useful.

i guess most users use nanovna saver and use the qt only for flashing new fw

saver is as useful as vna qt (besides the missing software upload) but
can show 4 (up to 6) values where qt only shows 3 (2 sweeps plus smith)

that may explain why no new features are added

dg9bfc sigi

Am 31.10.2020 um 08:51 schrieb mce66:

> Hello,
> do you know the status of the development of NanoVNA-QT? I've seen
> that this very nice tool is not recompiled since may, even if some
> commits are available. Moreover, no new feature have been implemented
> (like enhanced response or other possible improvements). It would be a
> pity since this tool is quite useful.
>

I am a big fan of nanovna-saver but let's be serious it does not really
NanovnaQT.

NanovnaQT has some key feature that nanovna-saver does not unfortunately
offer.
1) The possibility to easily measure and export 4 S parameters (thanks to
the S parameter menu) into an S2P file. Nanovna-saver does not offer the
possibility to generate a fully populated S2P file with the 4 S parameters,
it has to be done manually....
2) It is also runs faster than Nanovna-saver
3)The extended port facility works much better too.

Regards
Perer

On Sat, 31 Oct 2020, 15:51 Siegfried Jackstien, <
siegfried.jackstien@freenet.de> wrote:

> i guess most users use nanovna saver and use the qt only for flashing new
> fw
>
> saver is as useful as vna qt (besides the missing software upload) but can
> show 4 (up to 6) values where qt only shows 3 (2 sweeps plus smith)
>
> that may explain why no new features are added
>
> dg9bfc sigi
> Am 31.10.2020 um 08:51 schrieb mce66:
>
> Hello,
> do you know the status of the development of NanoVNA-QT? I've seen that
> this very nice tool is not recompiled since may, even if some commits are
> available. Moreover, no new feature have been implemented (like enhanced
> response or other possible improvements). It would be a pity since this
> tool is quite useful.
>
>
>