
Hello,
Is this device cable of testing lmr400/lmr600 coax for distance to fault?
Frequency under test is 910-920mhz and distance to 250 feet.
Thanks,
Mike
Note: this page is a mirror of https://groups.io/g/NanoVNAV2.
Click here to join and see most recent posts.
Hello,
Is this device cable of testing lmr400/lmr600 coax for distance to fault?
Frequency under test is 910-920mhz and distance to 250 feet.
Thanks,
Mike
Hello,
Is this device cable of testing lmr400/lmr600 coax for distance to fault?
Frequency under test is 910-920mhz and distance to 250 feet.
Thanks,
Mike
It's a VNA so yes.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 at 04:42, <Carhunter7@hotmail.com> wrote:
And now he has to find out how
Dg9bfc sigi
Am 10.01.2021 05:59 schrieb Dragan Milivojevic <d.milivojevic@gmail.com>:
> It's a VNA so yes.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 at 04:42,
<[Carhunter7@hotmail.com](mailto:Carhunter7@hotmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>> Hello,
> Is this device cable of testing lmr400/lmr600 coax for distance to fault?
> Frequency under test is 910-920mhz and distance to 250 feet.
> Thanks,
> Mike
_._,_._,_
* * *
Yes, the TDR function of the NANOs is capable of finding faults along the
cable. Just use a frequency sweep appropriate to the length of cable.
Even though you are using the cable at nominally 900 MHz, the length for
appropriate TDR should be in the single-digit MHz range. At 250-feet,
possibly 5 MHz would be appropriate. For attenuation measurements, of
course, run the frequency sweep at the frequencies of interest.
Dave - WØLEV
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:42 AM <Carhunter7@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Is this device cable of testing lmr400/lmr600 coax for distance to fault?
> Frequency under test is 910-920mhz and distance to 250 feet.
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
>
--
*Dave - WØLEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
To reply to this topic, join https://groups.io/g/NanoVNAV2